• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Daty be Dammed

Daty be Dammed
In New Zealand, while there isn't a legal requirement for escorts to explicitly state on their adverts that condoms must be used, they are legally obligated to ensure that safer sex practices are followed. This means they must take all reasonable steps to ensure that commercial sex services are not provided without the use of a condom or other appropriate barrier.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Safer Sex Practices are Mandatory:

The Prostitution Reform Act 2003 mandates that both sex workers and their clients must use condoms or other barrier methods to prevent the transmission of STIs.

Operators' Responsibility:

Businesses offering escort services must ensure that their workers and clients are adhering to safer sex practices.

No Explicit Advertising Requirement:

While not explicitly stated in advertising regulations, operators must ensure safer sex is promoted and practiced, which may involve mentioning it in adverts.

Promoting Safer Sex:

Websites or other advertising platforms for sexual services should not imply that services are available without condom use.

Potential Consequences:

Failure to adhere to safer sex practices can lead to prosecution for both the sex worker and the client.
 
I've spent enough time on this nonsense.. I'm out. These broads are all over the place "it's the law, how dare you dirty punters question anything, why should we have to lose business etc etc".... This shit is exhausting...

SF punters keep adding names to the threads or escorts put your DAM use preference in your profile that way no one will be disappointed...

Peace x
 
Aucklandpunter said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Perhaps the "Sugar" scene is more suited to your tastes.

Escorts must follow the Prostitution reform act 2003.

Escorts have the right to protect themselves from diseases.

Escorts have the right to decline clients if they are wanted sex service's they do not wish to perform.

It may not seem relevant to you but Stds and Stis are no joke and can have lasting ramifications for men and women.

Perhaps take a step back and consider that escorts are human and have rights.

They deserve to protect themselves.

Escorts don't want mens tongue, lips and mouth on their vagina, especially these days knowing the disease risk and by the sounds of the reviews on here, the blatant disregard for escorts health and the general public health.

Escorts don't want clients to "Spit" raw onto their vagina... Honestly its just revolting and disease spreading.

Take this as simple as it is.

ESCORTS IN NZ ARE REQUIRED TO ADHERE TO THE PROSTITUTION REFORM ACT 2003 AND PRACTICE SAFE SEX SERVICE'S AT ALL TIMES. CONDOMS AND LATEX SHEATH / DAMS MUST BE USED...... FOR EVERYONES SAFETY!

If this doesn't satisfy your sexual Appétite get a girlfriend. Easy.
 
I've been working within this industry long enough to see the changes.

6 years ago, pre covid, clients were respectful and condoms / dental dams weren't questioned.

Fast forward to the past year or 2 and it's absolutely snowballed....

Apparently, and I say this only due to forum feedback, its the norm for "some" escorts to perform raw bjs on clients, allow clients to have sex no condom and allow clients to perform oral sex on escorts raw....

Its common sense really.

Escorts, who follow the prostitution reform act 2003, exercise care and diligence and use protection at all times.

NO amount of money is worth risking ones health... or self respect!

The old adage, you get what you pay for...

Escorts would rather turn a client away than allow their body to be abused and exposed to disease! I know I would. Plenty of classy, intelligent, respectful clients out there without reducing ourselves to that level... The type of client who says "If I get offered VIP / Unprotected I walk! F**k that!
 
I don't know why it's so difficult to get a clear answer from you on this simple question:

Is it better for both punters, and SWs, for dam use to be made clear in the advertisement?

Seems to avoid all the dramas and keep the SW safe.

I've asked you several times, this is my last attempt to get an answer from you.
 
Top Dog 1968 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I really think you need to swap out the collective "escorts" with the first person "I /my vagina". It's getting tiring watching you speak for a group when you are in the (sub 5%) minority.

I suppose you think trans women are real women too... But I bet you aren't so militant about eating that manpussy raw lol

Also It's not called the Girl friend Experience (GFE) for no reason...
 
Last edited:
Aucklandpunter said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Oh buddy!

Gosh surely you don't think GFE = No protection!

Oh mi goodness...

Absolutely not!

I'm not in the minority, neither are the escorts in my acquaintance...

We simply follow Prostitution Reform Act 2003.

Its noted on our adverts "No unprotected sex service's"

AND

It's conveyed to clientele during txt bookings....

And 9 times out of 10 its not an issue at all!

In fact that 10%, if that, of non compliance request, means escorts dodged a rather unruly and disrespectful client.

We understand there is a certain "clientele" who request no condom, no latex and dfk... 🤮

Quality over quantity. Everyone.... And our bodies are healthy, well maintained and disease free....

As escorts we have to protect ourselves and perform our own due diligence on clients to ensure we are safe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top