B&S @ 55 Randolph St

B&S @ 55 Randolph St
ThreeSmokinNinjas

ThreeSmokinNinjas

Contributor
Wolf
May 9, 2024
114
86
28
Went there on the premise of seeing a girl called Emma. Had some text exchanges and i asked if she was the girl in the photos which she said yes, 100%. When I arrived it was definitely not her and she asked me who i was looking for. I said Emma and after a bit of typing it into the translator she ushered me into the room. I asked if Emma was coming and she closed the door and said that she was. I pulled out my phone and showed her that she was not the girl in the photos and i proceeded to open the door and leave. She knocked on the door beside to summon up another girl and I still said no and proceeded to leave despite the separate pleas I could hear behind me. I will not go back to this address. Subsequently, the Emma profile has been removed from Escortify.
 
That house on Randolph street is a venue where several different independents or semi privates (if they’re Asian workers) will operate from as it’s mainly a room rental place just saying. I have a few (non Asian) friends that usually work out of that location. If you experienced b&s then that’s the fault of the individual worker you saw, not that particular location since it’s not a formal agency.
 
the lady texted me saying this when I told her about the B&S
*translated from WeChat msg

That's when I'm busy.
Discussed with him, he agreed to arrange for him to other girls. do not agree is certainly not
I didn't want to keep him waiting.

of course, this might be some other punters
not trying to defend, but might be what Natasha has said
 
I've been to 55 Randolph Street a couple of times. I did have a B&S there, some Indian (Jasmin?) woman with fake photos. I walked. Another time I saw the same Chinese girl on two separate occasions, she provided a good service but has since moved on.

I'd be cautious about B&S if visiting there. Go in preparing for a B&S and be prepared to walk lol
 
Last edited:
JohnnyPunter said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...

Jasmin was already reported on AF before for being fake, idk about the other Chinese girls. In general though, when it comes to Chinese workers that are not working with one of the bigger shops (i.e 55a, Christinas, Pinkys etc) you should always go in expecting that there’s at least a 50% chance that the worker won’t resemble the photos from the ad imho.

All I’m saying is that I’ve personally known a number of friends over the years who would rent out a room and work from 55 Randolph st. I even have one friend who still uses that Incall even to this day on a regular basis for any of her Incall bookings. They were all working independently, managing their own phones/bookings btw. None of them were Jasmin or Asian btw. They were mostly kiwi/white girls or other nationality like Indian or Maori.

So yeah my point is, from now on if you try booking with another Asian worker and you’re told that the address there working from is Randolph st then of course proceed at your own risk or not at all. That’s up to you. If the worker you’re booking is a different nationality though then I’d personally suggest not to automatically rule them out simply because of the address they’re working from.

Locations like Randolph street are simply just premises that are affordable and easily accessible for workers who wish to work independently from agencies but for whatever reason they cannot afford to rent there own Incall apartment or its simply just not feasible for them (maybe they don’t do this work full time due to there personal lifestyle, other work commitments or personal life commitments) to rent there own Incall apartment. Speaking ill of the location specifically does a massive disservice to any of the other workers who may also use that space and rely on it as a location that they can frequently host Incall bookings from ☺️✌🏻
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top