• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Review Jojo 31156- great nuru massage

Review Jojo 31156- great nuru massage
J

jperry

Adventurer
Wolf
Big Daddy
151
239
43
I had not intended to visit Jojo- the ol balls had been filling up, and I unwisely decided to drive up to TKs late in the shifts there without calling beforehand. Unluckily, when I arrived they were closed, and of course Paris had no doubt shut up even before that. Anyhow, with a limited amount of cash in my pocket without trying to find an ATM, and late in the day, I figured I'd roll the dice with an Asian lady with a profile I hadn't researched before (although I see now there seem to be some good reviews of her on AF), and booked a 30 minute nuru massage.

Jojo was a very pleasant surprise. She's easy to communicate with, and eager to please. Photos are accurate, cute face, nice little body, great ass. Could be mid 30s, maybe late 30s. Gave an excellent (sensual) massage with bodyslides with warm oil, very erotic, unrushed. No kissing, although that isn't mentioned on the ad and I didn't ask in advance- the experience is generally very erotic regardless so I wasn't bothered. Showered together and washed me down well after busting. Well worth it for the reasonable price in my book.
EDIT:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
Nice review, but I do wish that girls would stop advertising "Nuru" massages when what you got was nothing of the sort which you have acknowledged with your sensual description.
 
MuchAdo said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. You don't consider naked women sliding over your body to be sensual? Do only Japanese gals count?

If you're referring to the rather odd practice of using the term 'nuru' to mean 'bare blowjobs'- that was not the case (nor did my post imply such).
 
[ I've never heard of the term 'nuru' referring to 'bare blowjobs' ]

What @MuchAdo is talking about is the fact that you specifically mention 'oil' when 'nuru' is a very specific type of [originally seaweed-based but now mostly artificially produced] gel. Common in Japan but relatively uncommon outside of it.

Some might consider it quibbling. Others might consider it mislabeling to extract a premium price: a "nuru massage" sounding more exotic than a "sensual massage" even if, when done with oil, it is actually exactly the same thing.
 
@Harry H thanks that is exactly what I was referring to. I do find that the Nuru Gel experience is a lot better than oil as you can spread it around a lot more :) The gel itself is becoming more common for example
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
sell it. Even
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
sell it for a better price. Another big advantage is that it washes off easily with no residue, unlike oil.

And yes, it is all about labelling a premium experience over a bog standard SM.
For @jperry, my comment was no criticism of you, rather a go at the marketing practices of a lot of asian sw. It may also mean that punters now know the question to ask when offered a Nuru Massage.
 
Last edited:
MuchAdo said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Nah, fair enough. To be honest- my suspicion is that you are right about the gel and that the lady in question used that (after heating briefly in microwave) as it did seem on reflection to have somewhat different consistency from massage oil. Just have never conceptualized of this as a different product.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top