NZG is going to make you pay for our numbers!!!
- 30
- 63
- 18
OK, I think everyone has failed to grasp the sheer brilliance of this NZG trial initiative.
There were 95 WN profiles and 115 CH profiles on display this afternoon. Allowing for some ads being offline, let’s call it 100 (WN) and 120 (CH). That’s 220 ads per week at $165 each x 4 weeks = $145k in lost advertising revenue.
AND they get to annoy many of their long-established paying advertisers, who may simply jump ship.
AND they get to annoy a myriad of punters who suddenly have to pay $9.99 to access the ladies’ telephone numbers — something that had always been free.
Brilliant.
Oh, maybe I’m oversimplifying? If 14,500 punters pay the 4-week access fee, they’ll break even. Genius.
So let’s leave the marketing experts to do their jobs, guys. As Sledgehammer used to say, “I know what I’m doing!”
There were 95 WN profiles and 115 CH profiles on display this afternoon. Allowing for some ads being offline, let’s call it 100 (WN) and 120 (CH). That’s 220 ads per week at $165 each x 4 weeks = $145k in lost advertising revenue.
AND they get to annoy many of their long-established paying advertisers, who may simply jump ship.
AND they get to annoy a myriad of punters who suddenly have to pay $9.99 to access the ladies’ telephone numbers — something that had always been free.
Brilliant.
Oh, maybe I’m oversimplifying? If 14,500 punters pay the 4-week access fee, they’ll break even. Genius.
So let’s leave the marketing experts to do their jobs, guys. As Sledgehammer used to say, “I know what I’m doing!”