• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Review WARNING: Traumatic Experience at Crystal and Friends – Nightmare Became Reality

Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Like i said laying it on a bit thick mate. Rape? She said he received full service and refused to pay the extras. Hardly a rape accusation, she was drunk and tried to hustle him for extras he didnt receive.

She ''grabbed his arm as he was trying to leave, and in doing so left a visible scratch" hardly assault with intent to injure.
 
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
If a SW has agreed to FS and so charge for it but then punter won't pay, it would legally be rape. That's exactly what she was trying to do.

The 'drunk' comment doesnt work. Same as it wouldnt if a guy was drunk and tried to slip it in.

Maybe common sense isn't so common for some of you. Most on this thread get it though. Just a couple who don't
 
Last edited:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
No you are taking it to an EXTREME to be right, and your not. And you are adding spice to the story that the OP NEVER mentioned.

And since i got time, you are not as smart as you think. A simple google search.

"Not paying a sex worker after engaging in sexual activity does not automatically constitute rape. While non-payment can be a form of exploitation and breach of contract, it generally doesn't meet the legal definition of rape, which requires non-consensual sexual acts. However, in some jurisdictions, cases involving deception about payment to obtain consent for sex have been considered rape. "
 
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!


You have to be really careful of any potential rape or sexual offending accusations and situations, google Savenaca Seruvatu, he got convicted of rape last year for discretely removing his condom without the SW knowing, 4 years sitting in prison with bubba for him

..... just saying (y)
 
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
So you'd be totally unshaken if it happened to you clearly.
Any SWs willing to test out the big guy, see if his composure goes beyond the keyboard?
Easy to be cool and collected in the comfort of your mother's basement, or whereever you're tapping it out from.
Not so easy to stay frosty when the metal is hitting the meat.

You also, wrongly, said that someone was taking to extremes by mentioning something that the OP never mentioned.
Except the OP did say that the SW insisted FS had gone on, despite it not (and not being a service she advertises that she does ... I checked the website).
So therefore that could very easily turn into a rape elegation, without any fanciful leaps of logic, the ingedients are all there.
Dismissing something as 'extreme' is not the same thing as it actually being extreme, that's just your limited interpretation based on a bias (toward what, I'll let the audience decide).

Hardly an intent to injure.
So why then was she attempting to detain him?
To what purpose was that (except the obvious, to continue to attempt to extort the guy).
And why did she scratch him at all?
To what innocent purpose can you assign that action.
While we''re at it, was it innocent hijinks when she is trying to extort extra money out of him, so that she doesn't make up a story?
Maybe it all just became innocent hijinks when management got involved and suddenly the stories all changed, obviously that wasn't an attempt to cover up what she just tried to pull ... just a late April fool's, right?

But again, I challenge you to actually put yourself in OP's position for a second, and do so honestly, then really think if you still think that you are just of the receiving end of some harmless hijinks.
 
Last edited:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Cool story bud. The fact that it says "in some jurisdictions...." shows you are not looking in a New Zealand context with New Zealand law (we have one jurisdiction here you realise?)

Maybe try another google search given you said you have time (or not use AI) and put it in NZ context. You'll find a different answer.
 
Let's face it Crystal's is a shit show. I have thought about going back several times just to see if they have changed and improved their service. But every time I looked at their list of girls on the website I am instantly turned off and close the browser in disappointment. Why? Because half the girls are unattractive. Especially the plumpers. I can't comprehend how some of those girls get any bookings. But I guess some men have weird fetishes. Even the attractive girls have shitty unappealing unprofessional photos on there. Crappy filters and selfies. You would of thought maybe they would at least rustle some money together and organise a professional photoshoot for the poor girls. Maybe they would actually increase their business then. This incident is just the shit cherry ontop of the shit sundae. 💩
 
Last edited:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Okay

"In New Zealand, failing to pay a sex worker after engaging in sexual activity could be considered sexual assault, potentially even rape, if it involves a lack of consent. While prostitution is legal in New Zealand, including the exchange of money for sexual services, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
does not negate the laws against sexual assault. If a sex worker withdraws consent during sexual activity and the client continues without their consent, it is a crime. Even if payment is part of the agreement, it does not automatically grant consent for all sexual acts, and consent can be withdrawn at any time"
  • Non-payment as fraud:
    If payment is a condition of the agreement and is not provided, it can be argued that consent was obtained through fraud, which negates the consent itself.

  • KEY PHRASE '"CAN BE ARGUED"

 
One time years ago there was a asian lady called Kristy at 142 in Hornsby Sydney who tried to get extra money from me. When I said no she attacked me like this with nails out and scratched me. I smacked her so hard across the face she won't do that again.

You should of put her in her place. Be a man. No one should attack you in a whore house.

Kristy was a head case after I found her reviews. Talking to shit that wasn't there and losing the plot all the time. Remember reading a review of some poor prick took her up to the blue mountains for a weekend and ended up driving her back screaming and shit.

I went to see her again after this and the bitch gave me pink eye 😂😂
 
Last edited:
Y'all need to chill and quit the armchair lawyering. Always be careful though, as you never know.

Careful means:

- Not proceeding with the booking if she seems drunk, even slightly
- Using clear lines of communication and asking first before trying anything that is not explicitly agreed to (save the text messages)
- Text the agency afterward thanking them for the excellent experience, their reply thanking you may help you evidentially if it goes pear shaped
- Notice where the cameras are when you're walking out and interact with her in a way that is consistent with the consensual and legit booking you had

Most importantly, don't let the small number of psychos make you overly suspicious/cautious. Most SWs are legit and not trying to destroy your whole life.

Editing to add that less reputable agencies will promise you everything under the sun even without the girls agreement. Stick with the basic service and check in with her first to be safe.
 
Last edited:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Bro, your a laying it on to thick.. for real. You are lost on hypothetical street, turn around and ask for directions back to reality.

To answer your question? 100% yes.. Is OP in a jail cell at the moment? When is his court date? He doesnt have to argue there was no rape, never did, was never even mentioned in his post. He walked out the club a free man. His dispute is he didnt get the hand job he paid for and wants Crystal and Friends to rub one out for free. In the moment he was never accused of rape. And he walked out that door. You and I have spent more time arguing about this than OP and Samara did. He was accused of getting FS as an agreed upon extra and not paying, which was swiftly disregarded by management after a quick investigation. Fuck has he even replied to a single comment in this thread since posting this? Is HE telling the truth? Is he just a disgruntled punter?

And i know you dont wanna admit you are wrong but ''Can be argued'' legally means its a long shot. Its the same as ''in some jurisdictions''

Il break it down nice and simple... No hypotheticals.

Bro turned up for a cheap rub and tug, and the girl was WASTED.. 15 mins in she spazzed out, ended the booking and tried to hustle him for more money.. When he refused she caused a scene. Manager stepped in assesed the situation, determined the girl was to drunk and was in the wrong, but ''no refunds''.. The Punter left with a full ball sack down $160 hoping the manger will give him $160 credit.
 
Top