NO SHOWS
AvaMILF
Adventurer

- 47
- 158
- 33
This below comes via a provider who text me, and does not feel 'safe' to post herself (which I entirely understand and appreciate). This is the 5th message Ive received in the same vein since I first posted last night. Just in-case yall thought I was alone in my thoughts here.
'In what world does losing out on spending disposable income, equate to losing out on livelihood contributing financials? Plus a risk of clients changing phone numbers, means requests via deception leading to potential retaliation in-person, from having had a number blocked.
This does not seem to register in this entire discussion! Why are you all so focussed on missing out on spending money you already had, just for having a sexual experience that is (NOT a human right), whereas making a living to afford basic human rights of housing and food etc which SW provides), over a safety and harassment concern for girls you say you "respect"?

'In what world does losing out on spending disposable income, equate to losing out on livelihood contributing financials? Plus a risk of clients changing phone numbers, means requests via deception leading to potential retaliation in-person, from having had a number blocked.
This does not seem to register in this entire discussion! Why are you all so focussed on missing out on spending money you already had, just for having a sexual experience that is (NOT a human right), whereas making a living to afford basic human rights of housing and food etc which SW provides), over a safety and harassment concern for girls you say you "respect"?
