• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Amber o'hara 62 years old!!!! In hataitai

Amber o'hara 62 years old!!!! In hataitai
M

muffmaster

Contributor
121
106
43
What a fright I got when I seen that this thing was 62 years old and up in wellys currently....wellington will be on gridlock getting over to the eastern suburbs...with all the men wanting to fuck a 62 year old know it all mut...NOT lol
 
Amber is somewhat of a legend in the industry and by all accounts offers an exceptional service. Maybe not your thing which is fine but for many she delivers in spades.
 
Porsinka said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I've never seen her and believe me never would want too....so can't comment on her services....but I know full well she's a bitch from the way she's treated dozens of guys on that lame adult forum she was an admin on.banning guys for telling the truth and warning others of bad experiences is what it should be all about.aswell as letting others know of good experiences too of course.getting all up on her high horse just because your posting bad reviews shouldn't get you banned.
 
I cannot stand Amber personally, in fact I detest her. However, these comments are proving the criticisms of this forum are both accurate and warranted.

It's obvious that this forum and its members are on the road to inevitable legal issues.

Which is a shame really, because the premise of decent reviews and discussion was initially what brought me here as a punter.

Turns out, you can't self regulate and it's proving to be exactly what the ladies have been sounding the alarm about.
 
While it's clearly not polite calling someone "thing", "mutt", or "bitch", how are there any legal issues with that? I think that sort of thing only becomes illegal if done repeatedly and then it's considered harassment or bullying.
 
ManBehavingBadly said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Because despite the coping, members are not anonymous and never were.

It's only a matter of time until you decide to pile on the wrong person, perhaps someone outs personal information of a vulnerable person during a scuffle.
Members may engage in harassment long enough to meet the threshold of what could be considered targeted/ongoing and push it to the point of a case worth taking to the courts.

Unlikely you would be convicted of a crime in the end, but your identity would be outed and you'd end up going through an unsavory process getting to that end point.

Self regulation is free, and any good lawyer would suggest it as the alternative can be costly in more ways than one.
 
According to you, someone who is not a lawyer.

Say you end up inevitably getting yourselves into trouble, there is no such thing as a brush off once that process begins.

This is where you are unable to offer any assurance of this "safe space" to your members, as it would need to simply play out and we would all see where it ends up.

Either way, I've got my popcorn and my ☆☆ FREE SPEECH☆☆ tshirt on.
JohnnyPunter said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
 
BigTiddyLover said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I agree full stop! we are putting ourselves at serious risk. it is inevitible we will all have our identities revealed to the authorities. The police certainly have the resources to determine the true identities of all punters present on this forum, track them down, and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. (appropriate, considering the offense)

I for one, intend to pre-empt them. I have engaged my legal representatives, and they have advised all legal correspondence on the matter can be forwarded directly to I, OLDMACDONALD, and my SOLICITORS! at the below noted address:

ATTN: Oldmacdonald & his high priced barristers and solicitors
Waitākere Refuse and Recycling Transfer Station
50 The Concourse,
Henderson, Auckland 0610
 
What is classed as unlawful online harassment and bullying under New Zealand law?

KEY LEGAL FRAMEWORKS
- Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 (Hdca) -
This is the main law dealing with online harassment / bullying in NZ via digital means.

- Harassment Act 1997 -
Covers harassment (not necessarily digital) including patterns of behaviour that cause fear, distress, or intimidation.

WHAT COUNTS AS UNLAWFUL IN ONLINE HARASSMENT / BULLYING
Here are the kinds of behaviour that can trigger legal action, or be considered “unlawful,” under those laws:

- Behaviour -
Deliberate online communications that cause serious emotional distress

- Examples -
Sending repeated harassing messages; public humiliation or abuse; sharing hurtful or false rumours;

- False allegations -
Grossly offensive content, or revealing sensitive personal facts. If communications are false allegations; or reveal private facts; or are grossly offensive, indecent or obscene; or content that’s harassing.

WHEN IT BECOMES UNLAWFUL / THRESHOLD
Under the HDCA: If someone intended their communication to cause harm, it is reasonably expected a person in the target’s position would be harmed by it, and the target does suffer serious emotional distress.

THRESHOLDS & WHAT DOESN’T ALWAYS QUALIFY -
- Pattern of behaviour -
Many laws (e.g. Harassment Act) require a “pattern” — more than one incident / repeated behaviour over time. For example, Harassment Act 1997 requires at least two “specified acts” within 12 months directed at the same person.

- Reasonableness and foreseeability -
It must be reasonable to expect that someone in the target’s position would be harmed by the communication. The sender’s intention and knowledge are relevant.


REMEDIES AND PENALTIES -
- Criminal penalties under the HDCA -
up to 2 years’ imprisonment, fines (for individuals or companies) for serious cases.

- Civil remedies -
Courts can issue orders to take down content, restraining orders, etc. Also, Netsafe is the approved agency for HDCA complaints and can help mediate or escalate.

NOTE - This is not all the information in its entirety, I have pulled out the bits that are relevant in this context.
REF - ChatGpt
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top