Anyone been able to get FS from a massage place?
@hornyjedi, @Jessie45 and @explore96 The Sakura at Veras who allegedly spread STI's is NOT the Sakura referenced at Crystals who was previously independent and had never worked at Vera's.
I had the same experience at this place. She got excited on my second visit. More open to extras and is flirty so wasn’t entirely surprised when it happened. She did say her regulars get special treatment explains why sometimes she is booked out.
Yes the young Sakura who worked at Veras went back to Japan months ago . Sakura who was at Wakefield and now Crystals is not the one I was referring to .
Lol thats gotta be Sophia
Haha Henry u dogg.. sad one.
"........Lol thats gotta be Sophia..........."
She has long since left NZ.
Correct
A lot of us have done fs at these places but have the sense not to name the girls
Maybe the question is does the girl that did FS still work at Oasis?
All sex services are against visa conditions. You seem personally pretty invested in this topic being kept under wraps so, perhaps we should stop talking about HE or any other extras too?
This is most of the fun punting at the massage end of the spectrum.. I'm with Freddie !
I know some operators at places like these . They sponser girls so they obtain a working visa . If girls are happy to give clients fs then good for them you don't mention names and places on forums . People don't realize immigration look at forums and next thing these places are looked into .
If you know the operations then you would know that any girl providing any paid sex services is usually breaching visa conditions. If some of them decide to provide full service then it doesn't make it any better or worse for them. I think you could celebrate the win and stop gatekeeping
You seem to think operators know what goes on behind closed doors dude and they work at reception every day . Operators face hefty fines and can lose their businesses thats something know one wants to see .
It’s a super fine line to walk between providing useful commentary and too much information.
Correct!