B&S list
Hi everyone,
As recommended by a punter in a comment to my previous post, there is a need to maintain a list of B&S advertisements.
For those who don’t know, a bait-and-switch (B&S) occurs when the escort photographed in the advertisement is not the one who you would end up seeing should you make a booking, often decades older, not nearly as attractive and simply not who you wanted to see. Wellington in particular is notorious for these types of operations. In my experience, a significant majority of the ads on Escortify are B&Ss and I’m more than sure others will agree.
The benefit of creating a list of known B&S ads include:
1) Most obviously, it will provide a list of ads to avoid.
2) A number of B&S operators do not update their URLs - after a while, they simply update the photos, description, location etc of an ad to imitate a new profile. In maintaining a list URLs of known B&S ads we can keep track of these profiles even if the details change.
3) Many of these profiles use photos stolen from legit escorts. Therefore, if you request a review of a B&S operator using stolen photos, some Sex/Adult forum users may see the photos and assume the ad belongs to the legit operator and proceed to provide a positive review. Keeping a list of B&S URLs overcomes this issue.
Providing a mechanism to preemptively avoid getting B&Sed will hopefully see a decline in business directed to these operations and dissuade their continued existence.
As my previous post shows, getting B&Sed can put you in a potentially volatile situation so I encourage anyone who knows of or comes to know any B&S ads to post them below.
Thank you!
Edit:
The list of confirmed B&S links (complied from comments below) is:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
As recommended by a punter in a comment to my previous post, there is a need to maintain a list of B&S advertisements.
For those who don’t know, a bait-and-switch (B&S) occurs when the escort photographed in the advertisement is not the one who you would end up seeing should you make a booking, often decades older, not nearly as attractive and simply not who you wanted to see. Wellington in particular is notorious for these types of operations. In my experience, a significant majority of the ads on Escortify are B&Ss and I’m more than sure others will agree.
The benefit of creating a list of known B&S ads include:
1) Most obviously, it will provide a list of ads to avoid.
2) A number of B&S operators do not update their URLs - after a while, they simply update the photos, description, location etc of an ad to imitate a new profile. In maintaining a list URLs of known B&S ads we can keep track of these profiles even if the details change.
3) Many of these profiles use photos stolen from legit escorts. Therefore, if you request a review of a B&S operator using stolen photos, some Sex/Adult forum users may see the photos and assume the ad belongs to the legit operator and proceed to provide a positive review. Keeping a list of B&S URLs overcomes this issue.
Providing a mechanism to preemptively avoid getting B&Sed will hopefully see a decline in business directed to these operations and dissuade their continued existence.
As my previous post shows, getting B&Sed can put you in a potentially volatile situation so I encourage anyone who knows of or comes to know any B&S ads to post them below.
Thank you!
Edit:
The list of confirmed B&S links (complied from comments below) is:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
Last edited:
