Ban Amber
Whether its her or not Natasha , she will be lurking on here and will know exactly what people think of her
Ban Amber
- Thread starter Jessie45
- Start date
- Oct 21, 2024
- 582
- 995
- 93
- 18
Never thought of SF as a Refugee Camp before .
Suspose it is in some respects . Didn't come here to escape her , came here as its 99% about Sex . AF is everything except Sex .
- May 26, 2024
- 1,899
- 3,357
- 113
Somehow I don't even think @Amber Ohara is the actual Amber Ohara. Just someone taking the piss 
But I could be wrong. Maybe she could verify herself with a selfie of her with a shoe on her head holding a piece of paper with todays date and "Cunt" written on it.
But I could be wrong. Maybe she could verify herself with a selfie of her with a shoe on her head holding a piece of paper with todays date and "Cunt" written on it.
Different writing cadence suggests it's a man. Possibly Colonel Sanders Wilbert or maybe one of those stoogey AF guys like Wingy or Ned
Either way, they can all go fuck off. The other ones I could care less about (except Wilbert, he’s a good cunt. But still I feel like being in a space like this, it may give him an early heart attack lmao and I don’t wish this for him).
Amber Ohara
New Member
- Apr 18, 2025
- 19
- 17
- 3
Natasha i feel like we are sisters and i'll always have your back
However here's a news flash for you. You were never banned because you were a protected species. You were the only person who could slag anyone off on the forum and get away with it. Anyone who came in confrontation with you was outed for a few days while you survived. The reason for that my dear was that Mr AF had the hots for you!
AHAHAHAHAHAHHHAAA, what fucking drivel is this. Ok you got me there, I thought for a solid minute this was the real Amber. Obviously you’re an impersonator.
Btw I know exactly who you are, only one person has ever said anything along the lines of what you’re tryna get at with that comment.
I’m just super curious. Without outright naming who you are on here, I really wanna know. Why did you feel the need to make a second active account on here under a workers name? What exactly are you hoping to achieve man? Or is this all just entertainment for you? Stir up a little nonsense drama to get your kicks outta that, are you really that bored these days man??? Man this is just downright stupid, even for you. Please, do better.
Also I forgot to note, I was temporarily banned on AF before. You wouldn’t know about that though because you weren’t around anymore when that all went down. The real Amber would know this though because it was due to me making a snide comment towards her that Mr AF chose to temporarily ban me at the time. Nice try though
Last edited:
DAOK?
I’m not gonna say any names, y’all can speculate all you want
Disappointing tbh
Amber Ohara
New Member
- Apr 18, 2025
- 19
- 17
- 3
Well that's confusing
Depends which voice in your head is telling you that
Dude stop this weird nonsense. You are harming the mission with dumb shit like this
- Aug 21, 2024
- 222
- 289
- 63
She was a mod while still advertising on NZG. Conflict of interest, anyone??
daok
Specialist
- Apr 15, 2025
- 99
- 269
- 53
This is nothing to do with me. I don’t hide behind fake names, nor do I have any animosity towards you.
- Jun 1, 2024
- 257
- 444
- 63
Have to take issue with your comments here. Wilbert is an invertebrate, that is a creature lacking a back bone.
He willingly, and knowingly, promulgated lies - which, in my humble opinion, makes him a bad guy.
Sure, there are his health issues, but that doesn’t provide licence for the lies.
Last edited:
What's with the ex-Adult Forum members getting all butthurt about what happened on another forum in the past?
Move on, puh-lease!
You're sounding like the spoilt little brat that moans about how auntie gave you a deserved spanking when you were naughty at her place.
Move on, puh-lease!
You're sounding like the spoilt little brat that moans about how auntie gave you a deserved spanking when you were naughty at her place.
Last edited:
- Jun 1, 2024
- 257
- 444
- 63
Didn’t broach the subject, but if there’s a statement the needs refuting, I’ll refute it.
