Banter vs Reviews: Why Accuracy Matters
AbsoulteCNTT
Contributor
Banter and random tagging are part of forum chatter, but if you haven’t actually booked an escort, it isn’t a review — it’s speculation. Adding escort names or links to casual banter, guesses, or second-hand comments does not make those statements factual. It often results in misinformation being repeated as though it were truth.
Being blonde with curves does not make every woman interchangeable. Assuming someone’s identity, location , work history, or experience based or appearance alone is rarely accurate and ignores the real differences between individuals. When comments are made without firsthand experience, they reflect assumptions rather than reality.
If there has been no booking, no meeting, and no direct interaction, then what’s being shared is opinion or forum chatter — not evidence, not a review, and not something that should be presented as fact.
It’s also important to remember that for escorts, this is our business and livelihood. While people may joke about what we “sell,” the reality is that this is professional work, legal profession in nz and our reputations directly affect our income, safety, and wellbeing. Casual or careless commentary can have real consequences.
Many escorts — myself included — have experienced situations where simply participating in discussion or disagreeing with certain punters for example JohnnyPunter has led to targeted behaviour. This can include group chats forming and escorts being publicly tagged with claims such as drug use, mental health issues, or other put-downs — despite no booking ever taking place. These are not reviews and are not based on experience.
This isn’t about shutting down discussion. Genuine reviews from real bookings are valid. What matters is keeping a clear line between firsthand experience and speculation. Respect, accuracy, and accountability benefit everyone using the forum. Tagging escort links should only be added in actual reviews .
Being blonde with curves does not make every woman interchangeable. Assuming someone’s identity, location , work history, or experience based or appearance alone is rarely accurate and ignores the real differences between individuals. When comments are made without firsthand experience, they reflect assumptions rather than reality.
If there has been no booking, no meeting, and no direct interaction, then what’s being shared is opinion or forum chatter — not evidence, not a review, and not something that should be presented as fact.
It’s also important to remember that for escorts, this is our business and livelihood. While people may joke about what we “sell,” the reality is that this is professional work, legal profession in nz and our reputations directly affect our income, safety, and wellbeing. Casual or careless commentary can have real consequences.
Many escorts — myself included — have experienced situations where simply participating in discussion or disagreeing with certain punters for example JohnnyPunter has led to targeted behaviour. This can include group chats forming and escorts being publicly tagged with claims such as drug use, mental health issues, or other put-downs — despite no booking ever taking place. These are not reviews and are not based on experience.
This isn’t about shutting down discussion. Genuine reviews from real bookings are valid. What matters is keeping a clear line between firsthand experience and speculation. Respect, accuracy, and accountability benefit everyone using the forum. Tagging escort links should only be added in actual reviews .
Last edited:
