• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Dental dam list?

Dental dam list?
Z

Zen

New Member
5
9
3
Hi team, I’m all for SWs having an individual right to use Dental dams but I also believe punters have a right to know what they are getting into BEFORE they make a Booking.
I’ve been stung twice now at LF (Raven and Anora) insisting on dental dams, which suck IMHO.
Both are smoking hot girls and easy to chat too, but ******* DATY is one of my favourite hobbies so I’d appreciate it if those who share the same opinion as me could contribute to this thread so that ALL punters can decide for themselves.
If one prefers to use DDs ( I’d highly recommend Raven and Anora, the latter is also a HELL of a Squirter for an extra $150!) BUT if one prefers ******* DATY, then they might not be for you.
I hope this thread might save us from disappointment.
 
Onyxx said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I agree was written very respectfully, but is it not part of our legislation and our legal responsibility to use dental dams not only to protect ourselves but our clients aswell? We expect clients to wear condoms in every direct contact situation so why the double standard?
Is listing girls that don’t use them essentially telling on them for breaking the law? Or at I missing something here?
 
Last edited:
Blackcat23 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Is the law intentionally vague about this because it's clear that most people simply wouldn't abide by it?

It states: "A person must not provide or receive commercial sexual services unless he or she has taken all reasonable steps to ensure a prophylactic sheath or other appropriate barrier is used if those services involve vaginal, anal, or oral penetration or another activity with a similar or greater risk of acquiring or transmitting sexually transmissible infections." No mention of cunnilingus other than the bit in bold, and who aside from medical experts would have any idea whether or not the risk is similar or greater than for fellatio (where protection is explicitly required).
 
Blackcat23 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Thanks for your reply.
I guess I should clarify.
I’m not asking for people to list the ‘majority of girls’ who don’t use DDs, lest they get in trouble.

Just to merely list the minority who prefer to use DDs.

I say minority because based on my personal sample size of n73 so far, only 3 have ever used DDs with me, and I have never caught an STI.
 
Zen said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I've been asked once out of over 300 girls. I didn't enjoy it at all. If ever asked again I'd just forego that activity. I absolutely love eating pussy, so would probably not book someone who requires a dental dam (or who doesn't offer cunnilingus).

Is it common enough to bother with a list? Maybe it's just this one agency?
 
I understand it’s disappointing for clientele to experience the dreaded dental dam however I would like to think more girls are prioritising their sexual health above anything…this alone should fill punters with reassurance they are taking every step necessary to protect their clients and to put it into perspective ….it takes one client with a forming cold sore ( next to no symptoms for some ) to go down on a girl now she possibly will develop genital herpes not only does she have to contend with that but also an early unplanned exit for the industry. Food for thought no?
 
Blackcat23 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Not sure why a client would feel any right to be disappointed maybe number 3 but if so then mention on here.

To lazy to type a 4th coherently

1) Clients fault didn’t read the advert/website or clarify when making booking

2) Client fault turns up with suspect health or hygiene SWer not at fault for declining service

3) Maybe someone else’s fault but could have clarified at booking a must have. Advert/Website doesn’t mention use of or intentionally ambiguous a client could feel a bit pissy. Idk it could be ad platform or agency website at fault not SWer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top