• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Don’t waste your time with Audrey

Don’t waste your time with Audrey
Don't need to someone else has. See the review.
It sort of shows how off the mark your non review was.
Maybe you don't meet her preferred demographic anyway.
As Johnny said your post could damage her livelihood and without a meeting her it seems a little unfair.
Don't you think. ?
 
Last edited:
I only saw her once years ago when she was at EG, so I don't know how much my review is worth, but I might as well throw my experience out there.

I booked her for a half hour, which I typically do for first-time visits because if we don't click, the remaining time after I "finish" can be a bit awkward. She mentioned in our post-coital chat that she prefers half-hour bookings because people "don't have sex for a whole hour" which put me off ever booking her for longer because I like coming back for longer bookings when I find a lady I really like. This seems to be reflected in her current prices because the $$ increase going above 30 mins is above average.

Anyway, for the main event, she was quite attractive, but it felt like she was going through a set routine rather than reacting to how I responded to anything she did to me, and the noises she made during penetration seemed faked. You can kind of tell when it's just a constant moaning and never changes in response to movement, whoever's on top. The kissing was also just very light, definitely not french kissing. She lists french kissing on her ad now, so that may have changed, but I have seen many WGs advertising french kissing who then only kiss very lightly (and I always take breath mints before going in).

When I said earlier (or on another thread) that my session with her was weird, I was thinking of some of the things she said in our chat at the end of the booking, expressing uncertainty about doing sex work because of another client telling her at the end of their booking that it's bad for your soul. Sounds like she had a self-loathing religious client who gets some serious post-nut guilt. I wouldn't hold this against her after this much time, but I thought I should explain my earlier remark if I'm going to leave a review at all.

Only other thing to add is that if she's looked after herself, her current pics would be accurate. Very hot bod.
 
Ironseid said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I just found her to be mechanical
Stand offish
Not really into oral at all
Generally a bit rude
End of the day I’m not really sure all this detail adds a huge amount.
Looks are fine
Comms were fine
But actually experience was substandard
To sum it up
She is better looking than 80% of the girls I’ve been with but I enjoyed it less than 80% of the other experiences I’ve had
Just my opinion of course
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top