• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Inaaya - Not worth it

Inaaya - Not worth it
Mate whats wrong with you ? Noone does that.

Noone also gets into deep abyss of self reflection of emotions as well.

This is a service.
They are service providers.

This ain't sex like you had with Gf, wife mate.

Apart from basic courtesies of life during the session, none of us get into simpness of male mind for WGs.
 
JoeyPonzi said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
It is interesting that on these anonymous online forums (not just this one, most of them) labels and insults are thrown around like confetti. In reality if we were all in a room together most of us would be meek and mild little lambs and not say boo to a goose.

Personally I find as soon as you label someone you do not know or put them into a nice convenient category we have a recipe for tit for tat insults. The most common one seems to be the use of the word SIMP. Interestingly some of those that jump on board to align themselves with the antisimpers are paradoxically simps for that very same act, lol. 🤣
 
FullyShaved said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I mean I do find many here as simps.

The moral high ground stuff for WGs is simp max to core.

I will die on this sword that this is a service, they are service providers and BECAUSE it is sex, male brain gets manipulated as it has been for a millennium as some fought wars for Helen of Troy as well LOL.

It is a service.
It will be reviewed as a product.
There was money exchanged and WGs make more than executives.

If we are reviewed, if the plummer is reviewed, if the electrician is..

so will they be.

Yes, the civilities must be followed, respect and the law

but beyond that, most talk here -
Yes it is male simp mind at work because it is sex And women 🤦🏽‍♂️😄.
 
samjosh11 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
WG's are providing a sexual service. Punters are paying for a sexual service. Provider and customer. Same as your example of an electrician. If we like the electrician and/or their service we are not simps for liking them, we are just appreciative clients.

Just seems to me there is this need for an us and them mentality. And all this talk tough on the internet BS. Why?
 
FullyShaved said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I think we are talking different things.

I am absolutely on appreciating great service and promoting their business.

As I am for reviewing the bad ones who are BandS or unprepared/unhygienic as this thread title says.

What I really find weird when punters start debating on human rights and stuff, mostly when it is bad service by WG.

As if overcompensating a perennial need to cuddle women.

A sex worker is a worker, it is a review and should be as the customer felt with civil words.
 
Let's take my gardener as an example, a nice person who provides me with a service... I offer him cookies and coffee, I chat, I treat him well... is it necessary? No, but I like to do that instead of ignoring his presence...

Everyone has a different background. I've spent more time with people in unconventional occupations like sex workers than with workers looking for sws, so I see the world according to my experience... and in my experience there's no need to belittle anyone... you can pay to pee on the girl, COF, humiliate and be humiliated, etc as long as it's consensual, and even come here and give a detailed review, after all it's a service...

but there's no need to incessantly repeat derogatory terms to refer to them, you understand?
What's the pleasure in endlessly repeating obscene terms to people who are doing you a service? And not even having the courage to introduce yourself when you're in the girl's presence...

Some of this attitudes are misogyny... and yes, you're a coward, not an OG or Conqueror or whatever your messed-up head believes you to be.
 
samjosh11 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I think we broadly agree on a few things. In regards this forum it provides a platform for punters in particular to exchange information about their punting experiences that may be of interest and use to other punters. And great also that SW's can also participate if they so choose.

I try to be respectful, objective and factual online (apart from some deliberate tongue in check lame efforts at humour), especially when discussing another individual. I find as soon as we steer off the central topic to point fingers at another poster and place a convenient label on them is invariably that recipe for a tit for tat. It is that I find a little bemusing, when a thread descends into this back and forth mud slinging. Rather pointless and it can get plain tedious. That is not to say I have not been a protagonist many times over the years in these shitfests, but hopefully I have largely learned the futility of doing so...most of the time. 🤣
 
JoeyPonzi said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I think you have framed a good description here, and I agree with your sentiment.

But I would ad your last sentence was unnecessary and just perpetuates the back and forth mudslinging by applying a derogatory label to the other poster. Had that last sentence been left out then I think the conversation centres on the topic and not personalities.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top