• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

NZG profiles Christchurch today.

NZG profiles Christchurch today.
Slippin Joey

Slippin Joey

Man of Culture
Big Daddy
Aug 9, 2024
855
1,375
93
All these $220 - $320 girls. Or ask for price girls.
All DND.
Model type photos.
Red flags all over them..
E.G Serena, Edie, Dora, Eva, Vivi, Jessie, and a few others etc
I wouldn't even consider booking them.
But the operator keeps with that formula so they must be getting bookings.
What's the chance of Edie being the real deal? Or Serena ?
 
sbq said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
If you look carefully at the bottom of the NZGirls adverts, some say:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
This means that you can't discuss them on Adult Forum, as AF is provided by NZGirls. The idea was that girls/establishments could choose to not be discussed. Of course this only worked when AF was the only place to discuss...
 
EzyRider said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...

So the acronym DND = Do Not Discuss

But where is the disclosure statement or terms of agreement around DND? I just find it unusual most of the listed girls have that naa2 DND at the bottom of their page - seems like some website designer code for a category these girls work under.

Thanks for sharing, i've learned a lot.
 
The significance for punters of seeing DND on the profile is this. You might ask yourself, why do they not want any discussion. I guess at best the girl just values her privacy. I can understand wanting privacy. Often punters say some awful things about a sex worker. Youve only got to have a look at some threads about EG girls. On the other hand at worst they might want to hide their poor service. Or as is often the case at Asian establishments it's a bait and switch situation. As Ezy Ryder mentioned DND doesn't apply here.
 
Last edited:
Johnnymac said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I think it's VERY important for clients to be fully aware on what to expect. It's not like shopping for a car or looking at tangible things. The sex industry has a lot of 'time wasters' and the experience is purely non-tangible.

So where do we draw the line on complaints or how we make reviews? I did a review of my experience with Locanto ads, and have been getting responses that I should not be posting the address of these workers. Unlike EG or TT where those escort establishments have a set place, I feel it's more important to disclose in public the actual place these SW work out of on the basis that they tend to move around a lot, and present a more 'shady' operative. Such as they go by multiple names and tend to change their mobile #s frequently. it gets very confusing if the public has no idea who is who or worse of all, don't know what they're getting into.

Again, the sex industry is already shady enough. The criticism should be allowed online just like for any other service because life is too short to be wasting time.
 
Adrian said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Just have a look at Yelp. The website has done very well around customers giving reviews on restaurants. Some where the owners have gone out of their way to sue customers for giving biased reviews (I think South Park did an episode on that where Cartman blackmails restaurants with Yelp reviews).

Consistency is the key. But how can we know about consistency from an individual perspective? One guy visits and gets a bad experience. Another guy visits and gets a bad experience. If neither guy talks to each other, individually they could assume that the sex worker had a bad day and would try again. But when in fact, all this does is wastes time. If the escort worker knows that their reputation is online, then they would think twice about their offering. Think twice if they think to rip clients off. Think twice about ... wasting time.
 
Well Im back in CHCH for work, had the opportunity to try Jessie today, and her flatmate at the *unnamed* motel is edie.

Jessie provides great service, nice N D cup. Photos are abit touched up, but is definitely her with 80% accuracy. Great service for the VIP, i would recommend a repeat visit. But pity shes leaving back to auckland on the morning flight

Edie on the other hand will stay abit longer. Since they in the same place had a chance to say hi, from what i can see, looks like also worth a visit also, shes a petite little thing.
 
sbq said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I certainly agree about pointing out shady or bad service. However, if someone moves around a lot, mentioning where they are working is not going to be much use. While you could argue that it's possible to get the address by calling them, posting the address here may help to enable some of the more creepy stalkers.

Of course, if it's something like Stella House, or the house on Grahams Road, or the other suburban Asian operations, that's less of a problem, - that's more like giving the address for EG.

On a slightly different issue, I find posts that just mention names, without links, are very frustrating. Sometimes there can be several girls in one city with the same name. Furthermore, it's helpful to be able to search the Forum for girls who may be touring. Knowing that at one point there was someone called "Lily" in Hamilton who was worth seeing doesn't help me sort out which one it is if she comes here...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top