• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Review Rylee - Executive Girls (EG)

Review Rylee - Executive Girls (EG)
S

StrobeLight13

Enthusiast
Wolf
28
35
13
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I recently booked a session with Rylee at Executive Girls. I want to preface this by saying these are my personal observations and feelings, but the experience was significantly impacted by a lack of perceived transparency.

The Experience​

  • Arrival & Vibe: The encounter started on a difficult note. While I have nothing against Rylee personally, the immediate physical impression was a major departure from what I had anticipated based on the agency's presentation.

The Drawbacks​

  • Physical Accuracy: The most striking issue was the lack of resemblance to the photos. Upon entering the room, I noticed several distinct masculine features, specifically large hands and feet, and unshaved and bulky (for a standard woman) legs. In any case, this was far outside my personal preference and the aesthetic expected. Regardless of the cause, the physical reality was not for me.
  • Communication: Further adding to the surprise was a very deep voice.
  • Expectation vs. Reality: I found it difficult to move forward with the session given the stark contrast between the online advertisement and the person standing in front of me. This lack of perceived disclosure led to me feeling very uncomfortable

Final Verdict​

If you a specific aesthetic when booking, you may find this experience jarring. Because the physical reality felt so far removed from my expectation i walked.

0/10
 
Last edited:
StrobeLight13 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Weird, this is so far removed from my experience to make me question the credibility and motive of the reviewer. There seems to be a none to subtle campaign to discredit EG going on. The place isn't perfect by any means but it has, and does, offer reasonably consistent good value for money. Along with VR & Atomic it's one of only three agencies in town that provides a wide range of sub $330/hour options.
 
Ironside said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
The only motive I have is to share my personal experience. While others, you included, may have had positive visits, or find value in the agency’s pricing, that doesn't negate the specific issues I encountered.

I am not commenting on the agency’s entire roster, nor am I part of any 'campaign.' I am simply a punter who felt there was a significant lack of transparency regarding the specific person I booked. A review is meant to reflect an individual encounter, mine was jarring and didn't match the advertisement in my view, which is why I shared it. If your experience was different, that’s fair, but it doesn't make my account any less credible.
 
Ironside said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I personally have never visited Rylee though she's been there for years but I have visited many others over the years and have found what StrobeLight13 to be correct. An example that immediately springs to mind is Storm who is described as having size C breasts and the second photo has a shot confirming this. The only trouble is that they are not her breasts as her breast size is an A at best. That is out and out deception or fraud. I doubt anyone can condone this.
 
Last edited:
No experience of Rylee, or EG for that matter. Understand your disappointment, but it would seem incumbent on a prospective punter to use whatever resources are available, to ameliorate the prospect of an unsatisfactory experience.

Rylee’s legs - which you termed ‘bulky (for a standard woman)’ - are clearly depicted, and, if not to your liking, why not look elsewhere?
 
The fact is that EG does all the girls working there a diservice by false representation as it puts the poor girl an embarrassing situation with a punter who is immediately displeased. It's a recipe for short term gain with longterm pain as punters go to those who offer a more honest description though again in many instances that is hard to find including with the independents and not just on Locanto.
 
StrobeLight13 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Personally, I feel the main issue with this, is the assumption that she must have been born a man. She would have the most amazing man built vagina ever, and to be perfectly honest; she does have an amazing pussy and asshole. My tongue has been deep in both 😂 . Just because she’s a ******* girly doesn’t mean she was born swinging 😂 You can very simply state that you prefer women who are fully shaved, because with everything, this seems to be the issue. And that’s fine, but this is a lot of words just to say she wasn’t feminine enough for you.
 
StrobeLight13 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
fair enough comments but i do wonder who did you see first, shyla or rylee. for shyla you say the shit facilities dragged down the experience but for rylee you just found her gross. were the shit facilities not an issue in the rylee booking lol
meanwhile you ignore shyla has a smoking hot body and focus solely on her face?
i find the 'While I have nothing against Rylee personally' line peculiar. like why would you and why say that lol
Seems like a bit of savage rip down of two young girls based on anything negative you could find?
i agree with piper that calling rylee mtf seems particularly shitty
 
GoddessPiper said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
The details regarding her physical attributes are irrelevant to the core of my review: the lack of transparency. Whether the disconnect stems from grooming, editing, or something else, the person I met did not match the expectation based on the advertising. Everyone has different preferences, and my review serves to inform others who, like myself, value accuracy in representation before committing to a session.
 
kennyt said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I didn't feel the need to repeat myself regarding the facilities. My opinion of them remains the same and they certainly didn't help the experience. As for the rest, there is a difference between a 'savage rip down' and an honest assessment of a personal experience.

My comment about having nothing against them personally is simply to clarify that this is a business critique. When I book a session based on a specific set of photos and a certain aesthetic, and the reality is a significant departure from that it is a failure in transparency.

I’m not 'searching' for negatives; I am reporting on why the service didn't meet my personal expectations. If the physical reality doesn't match the marketing, expectations, or personal preference, do we not have every every right to point that out so others can make an informed decision based on their own preferences?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top