Secret Liaisons - All girls list and reviews

- Dec 18, 2024
- 192
- 183
- 43
SL Scarlett. I mean if she is, I gotta say she is one of my favorite

Yea got your message @Jamesboi
SL Scarlett. I mean if she is, I gotta say she is one of my favorite
Bro please, as of now these are accusations. And I think an insider info is more authentic than mere hear say statements. This whole discussion has gone really wild.
Fair enough, I get why a new account might raise flags — but that doesn’t mean what’s being said isn’t true. Some of us make new accounts because speaking out openly comes with real risks. Just because someone’s new here doesn’t mean their experience isn’t valid.
This guy @punter0597 could be Sketchy Caleb.. He's on here...
It doesn't become invalid but it raises eyebrows.
That’s fair to a point, but when multiple people — with no connection to each other — are saying similar things over time, it stops being “hearsay” and starts looking like a pattern. Insider info isn’t always objective either, especially when people have something to protect. Sometimes it’s the ones who’ve walked away who see things for what they really are.
If I was Caleb, why would I be agreeing it’s the same? Make it make sense. Not everyone who calls something out is secretly someone else
I see your point. But again if hearsays are said overtime, it becomes the fake truth too. And if you are to dismiss an insider info, citing "something to protect", how do you get the truth. Even if cops investigate, they would go to the current members to investigate. So you can't deny insider info based on hearsays said over time.
I hear you, but if we only ever trusted “insiders,” we’d never hear the full story — especially when some insiders are too close to the situation or afraid to speak honestly. People leave for a reason. When former workers, clients, and observers start saying similar things over time, that’s not just hearsay — that’s a pattern worth paying attention to. Dismissing it outright does more harm than good.
True. Seems dumb for SL to target high school girls though? The amount of shit it brings down is risk vs potential reward is not that great. I mean how many 17 year old girls are great in bed and will give good service and create repeat business ? (answer : I don't know because the last time I fucked a 17 year old girl I was 17)...
Yeah taking down the bad guy.. I fucking love that shit
This reads like PR in disguise. Funny how it’s always the same phrases: “still going strong,” “they get the boot if they cause drama,” and somehow remembers specific girls’ timelines from years ago like a walking HR file. Most punters aren’t that emotionally invested in defending an agency’s reputation unless they’ve got a reason to be.
This just seems like a whole lotta hating kinda makes you wonder what the real motivation is. But nah, I’ve got no ties to the place, no affiliation or anything. Just really rate the girls there. Might even be worth a visit today, to be honest.
No ties to the place, but you remember girls’ names, where they went, how long they lasted, and now suddenly feel like visiting again? Sounds more like someone with a bruised ego doing cleanup on aisle SL. If you’ve got nothing to hide, you wouldn’t need a burner account to defend the place, promote your girlfriend, and hype up your favourite girls of the month like it’s some loyalty program.
Or its true . Look through other threads .You will see negative feedback as well from us , for indy girls and shops . I think SL is well above board and don't believe what has been implied on this thread I have never seen anything other than happy girls in my visits there . SC similar never seen anything negative in my visits
Wow crazy thread - shame it's understandably conflated SL with SC, but some of this is too juicy not to keep yarning about.
Well he's not really "running an agency" which is why that place is such a fucking slop house circus