• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Secret Liaisons - All girls list and reviews

I’ve come into hard solid evidence that @Lemon6949 is SL owner.
It seems girls are just fighting back from what he started, false reviews towards his ex girls.
Not sure if he will continue to deny, probably will just pop up with a new punting account down the line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow! Really not sure what to say about this thread and all the confusion around SL and SC. My head is spinning. All I will say is any publicity like this is good publicity and both these agencies are likely to get a flood of business on the back of it. It's exactly what happened there were those stories about the guy from SB in the media ( forget his name ). The girls said it got very busy after the story broke. So if the girls are trying to bring down their old bosses am not sure it's the way to do it. But who am I to tell. 🤔
 
yoelmathais said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Agree.
Where there is smoke there's fire, and it sounds like management/ownership of both these joints is suspect AF, so perhaps not such a shame the two have been conflated after all. One if not both sound like they're exerting coercive control over the girls, so I'd urge them to just exit and join better agencies.
 
Last edited:
customer said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
I agree. I stand by girls no matter what over any agencies. There are heaps of other agencies out there. My concern has always been about underage girls, because that is illegal and I wouldn't support it in anyway. I don't support abuse too. If the girls are abused, controlled or threatened, they should come out and I guess we who have been with the girls should support them. But as of now, we don't have any evidence but it's alleged that things are happening and lots of hearsays and everything is shared and discussed in an online forum with pseudonyms.
 
Lemon6949 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
@Lemon6949 @Scarlett__03 ive had information that you guys are trying to weaponize this pseudo legal nonsense to a) silence unhappy girls and b) stop girls working at other agencies etc (C+D letters etc). Any girls reading this - these guys are 100% full of shit : you are independent contractors - you can work for whoever the fuck you want. To try to blackmail you with threats of doxxing you to your families etc is a straight up serious criminal offence and falls under the laws of sexual slavery.

Note : I'm watching this closely now and my favourite sport in the world is taking down bad guys. @Lemon6949 @Scarlett__03 you guys would do well to step carefully with your treatment of these girls - if they want to move Agencies without retribution they are entitled to. As for SC Caleb (possibly @Chrisxcross - I'm still working out how Im going to unleash my furious vengeance on you for harming my friend, but it's coming buddy....)
 
Last edited:
Lemon6949 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
@Lemon6949 Shaun, Lemme, Lemon or whatever other names you have. I think you blew your cover with this comment and now I have enough evidence and reasons to believe you are the owner of SL lol. Today's comments in this thread has confirmed quite a lot of things about these allegations. Especially confirming Scarlett is one of the owners along with you which confirms the "couple" owners since she was insensible to post a NZP complaint up here.

I went back and started reading the thread all over again and it's pretty much easy to connect the dots and the evidence is just enough to conclude that both of you are in it.

And the ex girls confirming the same makes it clearer.

@Dx628282 @punter0597 I'm sorry for not believing your comments but I get the picture now.

To the girls, speak out. Save the future girls who might fall into this trap if you believe that you are not treated right. You all deserve better and threatening and coercing you to work and do things are also against the law. You don't have to work in such conditions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top