Sex Worker Address Safety + A Bunch Of Alex Jones TittyBabies - The Thread.
Sex Worker Address Safety + A Bunch Of Alex Jones TittyBabies - The Thread.
- Thread starter Bruhwhat
- Start date
- 3,546
- 8,000
- 113
Not everyone comes on here to post escort reviews and we do have a couple of resident working girls. It's just we appreciate people who positively contribute to the community if they are going to post on here.
- 1,084
- 2,104
- 113
Told by a good number of SWers this is the reason they don't work in there home town.
Orgazmo
Contributor
- 110
- 95
- 28
Bruhwhat
Contributor
- 56
- 97
- 18
Replying to my posts is NOT mandatory. And from the looks of some replies, I can safely say I am not the one filling this forum with negative drivel.
Go have fun with the 99.9 percent of the site I don't reply to. Some of you are such sensitive embarrassments.
So far whoever the moderator/admin is, they're doing an alright job with my concerns.
As for not being fun cute and sexy while posting my concerns
kind of is a you problem.
- 698
- 1,236
- 93
From my perspective, you’re most welcome on here. The points you raise are valid, although - as you know - anyone who can string together a few civilised sentences can discover a provider’s working address.
This site exists to protect those who are participating in an industry with little (to zero) practicable consumer protection. Yes, the consumer theoretically has recourse to the statutory apparatus of contract dispute. However, we all know that when you’re back on the pavement, feeling that you’ve just wasted several hundred dollars - not to mention your precious time - that your only practicable recourse comes by way of review.
Bruhwhat
Contributor
- 56
- 97
- 18
That is true. I do see why websites like this exist. I can imagine spending money that you worked hours for only to have bad experiences and no way to recoup the losses would leave one feeling demoralized, especially when all that was wanted was a good time and human contact. Even reputable agencies do bait and switch on slow days.
I can offer some useful review perhaps of one agency I'd occasionally work at in the past, Venusroom.
Madame Touché would on slow days that would not make money, have some of the Maori or Pacifika ladies working there take photos in indian-esque lingerie and post them as a separate escort from their usual profile.
I remember one guy being really disappointed, because he had unknowingly booked the same girl twice in one day. Basically swindled out of 500 dollars.
Not your fault we know , but as a punter I get so pissed off wasting my time travelling to a wg who has old pics or a B&S outfit
- 698
- 1,236
- 93
Thank for the insider insight, that one is criminally, tragically, hilarious
- 157
- 312
- 63
Or home country in the case of many Asian girls...
- 157
- 312
- 63
Yes, it's great that we now have another NZ site that has no restrictions on who can be reported on...
There are a lot of very odd and unsafe behaviour that occurs in this field and most of us take as many precautions as we can to maintain our safety. I guess it’s hard to full understand unless you have been subjected to such behaviour, the gravity of how far people will go and how much it impacts your day to day life. Just because we work in this industry doesn’t justify that it should be tolerated.
I don’t know if there is a SW site out there that reviews clients but could you imagine having your address or personal details (enough to identify who you might be or where you might live) put on the site when it really doesn’t need to be?
Most of us take precautions for punter discretion and safety on good will, surely this should work both ways regardless of whether it was a good or bad service (apart from linking the ad and area).
Naming the street and house colour a bit far and unnecessary. As a site I believe a bit more thought should be put into this and the legal ramifications around this. It made me just want my account deleted reading some of the nonchalant attitudes as it just felt really unsafe.
I don’t know if there is a SW site out there that reviews clients but could you imagine having your address or personal details (enough to identify who you might be or where you might live) put on the site when it really doesn’t need to be?
Most of us take precautions for punter discretion and safety on good will, surely this should work both ways regardless of whether it was a good or bad service (apart from linking the ad and area).
Naming the street and house colour a bit far and unnecessary. As a site I believe a bit more thought should be put into this and the legal ramifications around this. It made me just want my account deleted reading some of the nonchalant attitudes as it just felt really unsafe.
- 272
- 652
- 93
Thanks for this @LaraX.
As a punter I can run through in my head the sort of behaviour you might be talking about and from time to time, a SWer in the course of a booking I am with will relate a little of this - but only a little.
That said ... why do SWers on this site or AF not relate some of this behaviour and the precautions you take.
I can understand you might not want to bear all like that and some things in the SWer community will be kept in confidence.
But wouldn't it help if some of this behaviour is called out so that punters are aware of the things you have to do to stay safe?
Just my 2 cents worth ...
Bruhwhat
Contributor
- 56
- 97
- 18
The admin decided the house color, street name, and surrounding house details didn't breach their rules. At some point, it is going to bite them in the ass. I'm sure they'll enjoy the consequences when it hits them. Right now all I can do is screenshot and send to NZPC and police
Someone will get hurt, and it will point to doxxing posts on here, but can't say moderators and admins didn't/don't know.
Posts in regards to worker safety are met with such disgusting vitriol on here for the most part.
Edit to add: one thing that makes participating in this forum better is to go to settings and make it so you receive no notifications from anything you post or reply to. Also only checking in once in a while.
Last edited:
Without getting into the argument of how much or how little information about a location should or shouldn't be shared It's still only one random txt to get a sexworker's address, that part is hard to avoid
- 157
- 312
- 63
Well, it only takes one...
On the other hand, the worst case I've seen was girl who was harassed by someone who had seen her already. She got an order that prevented him entering the property, but he would hang out on the street (she sent me security movies).
I presume the SW's have reporting networks for annoying clients. Of course, it's possible to change sim cards, but at least it slows them down. And I also presume (partly from comments I've had when girls are going through their messages at the end of a booking) that they learn to read between the lines of the texts or phone calls. It's best for them to keep quiet about such details.
- 64
- 287
- 53
Hey gents,
I feel the need to add to what @Bruhwhat and @LaraX have said - this is actually a serious safety consideration for us. If reviewers could be a bit more cautious on our behalf, that would be super appreciated. I understand the need for there to be clarity about B+S houses and scams - that's a really valid problem, and your efforts to push back against does help both sides of the bed. So thank you. But can I ask, does it require sharing such specifc details of the building?
Yes bad actors can just get an address from making a fake booking with a burner phone. However while burners might be anonymous to the general public, the police have better tools. So if there is a record of who has contacted someone, then there's a chance they can be held accountable. This is especially important with cases of stalking. A girl who picks up an obsessive superfan on an outcall is no longer safe at her usual address. And if a girl changes premises to keep herself safe, she is wasting her time if her abuser can just get her new address off the internet.
I know that it sucks a lot to loose so much money to unscrupulous profiles, and if course you want to protect yourselves against that. But please try to not let our health and safety be the cost of protecting your discretionary spending.
I feel the need to add to what @Bruhwhat and @LaraX have said - this is actually a serious safety consideration for us. If reviewers could be a bit more cautious on our behalf, that would be super appreciated. I understand the need for there to be clarity about B+S houses and scams - that's a really valid problem, and your efforts to push back against does help both sides of the bed. So thank you. But can I ask, does it require sharing such specifc details of the building?
Yes bad actors can just get an address from making a fake booking with a burner phone. However while burners might be anonymous to the general public, the police have better tools. So if there is a record of who has contacted someone, then there's a chance they can be held accountable. This is especially important with cases of stalking. A girl who picks up an obsessive superfan on an outcall is no longer safe at her usual address. And if a girl changes premises to keep herself safe, she is wasting her time if her abuser can just get her new address off the internet.
I know that it sucks a lot to loose so much money to unscrupulous profiles, and if course you want to protect yourselves against that. But please try to not let our health and safety be the cost of protecting your discretionary spending.
Last edited:
- 698
- 1,236
- 93
Great post Elodie, so nice to see a provider post leading with logic and understanding.
So often, providers seem unable to present other than a singularly, emotionally charged, perspective.
Last edited:
