This has to be a wind up
This has to be a wind up
- Thread starter MuchAdo
- Start date
Genuinely that could actually be a possibility, or perhaps she meant to put $150 p/h but accidentally put $500 instead.
As well another thing to consider is that Nzg restrict us from putting our rates too low, we are not allowed to list our hourly rate lower then $150 (I included a screenshot from my escort login on Nzg as an example of this). She may have intended to put her hourly rate at $50 for instance but due the restrictions around how we can advertise she wasn’t able to list her rates accordingly.
Another thing to note is regardless of whether or not her rate is accurate on her ad, at the end of the day she is within her right to charge the rates that she chooses to list however much or little they happen to be. It’s within your right to choose to pay said rates. It’s entirely unnecessary to attempt to belittle and insult someones appearance though simply because you don’t feel that her rates are justified, beauty is subjective and whilst you may not personally find her attractive there will no doubt be someone out there that does
Attachments
- May 26, 2024
- 949
- 1,059
- 93
It's weird they don't allow golden showers. What's the big deal with a bit of piss
- May 29, 2024
- 30
- 55
- 18
Not my cup of tea but, yeah, it is weird. "Natural services" are illegal (though I doubt anyone will ever be prosecuted) but I can't see any way that law covers golden showers. Must just be a moral call, which is kinda funny. It is also a bit weird them having a $150 limit. What a girl charges isn't really any of their business.
- Jun 3, 2024
- 160
- 105
- 43
I love her fake tits. But yeah rest of body is meh.
- May 26, 2024
- 949
- 1,059
- 93
Her fake tits look like a C grade job done in China. You know the kind, lop sided, implants too big, and the nipples pointing in different directions like a pair of bung eyes. I bet they are hard as concrete as well.
- Jun 1, 2024
- 112
- 130
- 43
AF and NZG have interesting takes on advertising ethics and morality. Whilst infected urine carries a theoretical risk of transmitting an STI, NZG’s stance on golden showers is likely predicated on a view that it’s a ‘demeaning’ activity.
With AF and NZG, the only consistency is the inconsistency.
There have been charges laid for natural services, but its not talked about. Some girls are being told to hand over any numbers of anyone who ask for it, they can lodge a case with the police, I can't say how I know this though, but let me just say there are many numbers listed, you could be one if you are asking for it as it is illegal and considered harrassment so be wary!
I wouldn't want natural if they fucking all day though yuck!
- May 26, 2024
- 949
- 1,059
- 93
Don't be ridiculous. Like police are going to go arrest a person asking a sex worker for natural services. If a sex worker went into a police station to report that a prospective client asked for natural services they would give them a funny look and ask them to leave the police station. They are not going to arrest a person asking another person to give them a blowjob without a condom. My goodness, I think that is stupidest thing I've read on this forum yet.
What? Put penis in a mouth without a silicone sheath? Why Sir, that is a capital offense!!! What an outrage! I'm adding you to the list of deviant mouth burst requesters - you are number 2,023,300.
You soundd like a disgruntled sex worker who is angry at the possiblity you are missing out on clients because you don't provide services others do.
- May 29, 2024
- 29
- 26
- 3
It is a criminal offence but like with sheep rustling I'm inclined to doubt there is a special task force on this. What would it be called? Operation stop pox? Safe sex squad? What kind of cunstable seeks cell numbers of dirty punters from working girls Slim? If this is happening it needs to be looked into. Up to individuals concerned how germ sharing they want to be.
I'm keen to tap Treasures, love the confidence in the ask.
I'm keen to tap Treasures, love the confidence in the ask.
Last edited:
No I work within the field ( not a sex worker) and no arrests have happened, but plenty of $2000 fines. Do what you will with that, was just trying to help the bros out
- Jun 1, 2024
- 112
- 130
- 43
Can you elaborate on this, as - by your account - charges have been laid, a defended hearing(s) has ensued, and the defendant(s) fined.
What charges were laid, and what evidence was presented?
You are yet to convince me of the veracity of your contention.
Last edited:
- May 29, 2024
- 30
- 55
- 18
Bullshit. You're trolling but whatever. Court records are public documents, so how the fuck would all the prosecutions be kept secret? And why would the cops keep a successful result (from their pov) secret anyway? And why would they be spending their resources on a victimless crime in the first place when they don't even have the resources to investigate real crimes like burglaries?
- May 29, 2024
- 29
- 26
- 3
I get it. These will be Saffa cops up to their usual tricks. They will gather numbers from an aggrieved unnatural working girl then put it on the punter that they have been very norty and unless they want this going through official channels weeeeell, ahem... they had best cross the greedy little palm. A nice little earn to top up the sub-Ozzie wage deal.
- Jun 1, 2024
- 112
- 130
- 43
I can see where you are coming from but don’t think that Act applies in the way you are intimating. The advertising of sexual services is circumscribed via the PRA 2003, but other than with regards to matters of age, consent, and safer sex practices, the Act is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive.
If the advertising of ‘watersports’ were, in fact, illegal, then I doubt their widespread advertising at upmarket agencies would be a thing.
- May 29, 2024
- 30
- 55
- 18
Good on you for providing a link to back up your point with facts. Not alot of people do that. But I agree with Johnnymac, I don't think there is anything in that statute that would apply to a girl mentioning golden showers in an ad on a website for advertising adult services. My guess is not allowing rates less than $150 and not allowing ads for golden showers is part of the same thing, a presumption on the part of an advertiser that it is their role to protect the people who are paying them money, because they don't believe those people are mentally capable adults. It is pretty fucking insulting when you think about it.
I'm not interested in lowest cost services or bodily waste products, but if a guy wants something and is prepared to pay the asking price, and a girl is willing to provide something for a given price, who the fuck are NZG to say "no, we will take your money and let you offer him access to all your holes but nice little girls like you don't pee so don't even think about mentioning that. And also, you're better than that kitten, so charge him more you deserve it." Someone there thinks they're the daddy.
I'm not interested in lowest cost services or bodily waste products, but if a guy wants something and is prepared to pay the asking price, and a girl is willing to provide something for a given price, who the fuck are NZG to say "no, we will take your money and let you offer him access to all your holes but nice little girls like you don't pee so don't even think about mentioning that. And also, you're better than that kitten, so charge him more you deserve it." Someone there thinks they're the daddy.
I do know for a fact that both NZG and Escfy used to advertise it back 5+ years ago. Several girls have told me they we told they could no longer advertise it.
This is from the DIA website on 'having an Adult website':
for the publication or of objectionable material on a webpage or within an element of a webpage include imprisonment for up to ten years, and fines of up to $200,000.
If you operate an adult website and upload content – including content provided to you by another person – including text, video and/or images, you are responsible for ensuring that the content complies with the law, and you are responsible for ensuring that no is displayed or implied.
This is from the DIA website on 'having an Adult website':
No objectionable content
Webpages must not include .for the publication or of objectionable material on a webpage or within an element of a webpage include imprisonment for up to ten years, and fines of up to $200,000.
If you operate an adult website and upload content – including content provided to you by another person – including text, video and/or images, you are responsible for ensuring that the content complies with the law, and you are responsible for ensuring that no is displayed or implied.
