• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Daty be Dammed

Take it as a challenge - see if you can make things happen with the dam in place!
Girls have become great at giving pleasure with a condom on us guys, so....
 
Ironmonger said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Highly possible.
I have managed to get a girl across the line twice while she wore a female condom that covered everything.
Can't imagine that a dam would present any more issue in that respect.
It's all about skills gents.
That said, it isn't as rewarding as the giver as you don't get to experience the taste and scent, so wouldn't be my first choice ... but to quote Blackadder: Needs must when the devil farts in your iderdown (or however that is spelled)
 
Aucklandpunter said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Yes yes, simp, woke, blah blah blah.
It's ok David Seymour, you'll get a girl one day.


You don't have to want to book with an SW that uses a dam.
I'm on record saying in another thread that I think that it should be clearly stated on ads if that is a stipulation so that a client can not book with that SW if a dam is not part of an experience they want.
I personally am not a fan.
But me replying to the post that says take it as a challenge by saying that if you're wanting to just get the girl off then it is possible, doesn't make me a simp, or humiliated, or any of the other silly shit that you level at everyone.
Stop compensating and trying to be an edgelord, it's cringy and nowhere near as effective as you've talked yourself into it being.

Why some of the guys on here have such kneejerk reactions shows just how fragile some are.
 
Last edited:
Aucklandpunter said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Read my edited comment.
Infact nah, fuck it, I'll repost here:
You don't have to want to book with an SW that uses a dam.
I'm on record saying in another thread that I think that it should be clearly stated on ads if that is a stipulation so that a client can not book with that SW if a dam is not part of an experience they want.
I personally am not a fan.
But me replying to the post that says take it as a challenge by saying that if you're wanting to just get the girl off then it is possible, doesn't make me a simp, or humiliated, or any of the other silly shit that you level at everyone.
Stop compensating and trying to be an edgelord, it's cringy and nowhere near as effective as you've talked yourself into it being.

Why some of the guys on here have such kneejerk reactions shows just how fragile some are.

You need to chill out son. lol
 
Aucklandpunter said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
LOL

Go back to playing with your Legos little man.

Oh I mean, no please don't call me simp, faceless person on the internet attempting, badly, to try and cause me some kind of reaction.
I'll just melt if you call me simp.
LMFAO

Do ya feel like a real man now, or are you still a sad incel?
I'm Gen-X bro, you'll need to try waaaaaaaay harder than calling me a simp to upset me, you haven't even touched the sides, shit, my own mother said meaneer things to me when I was five years old.
 
Last edited:
meatmissile said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Seem triggered bro.

Here is the thing: if more punters push back against this new Dam nonsense it will stop. An executive gfe (DH/LF/TA etc) has always and should always include fk, raw daty and a covered bj (fingers inside seems to have always been a 50/50 thing)... By supporting the practice you are part of the problem...

A GFE with DAM use should be clearly notified and possibly discounted from full GFE rates...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top