• Welcome Notice

    Welcome Guest to SexForum!

    New Zealand’s Fastest Growing Adult Entertainment Forum!

Daty be Dammed

We are effectively asking the agencies to advertise that they only offer legal services, unusual for any other industry, e.g. your pharmacist saying that meth is not available lol.

I still think it's a win for both punters (big investment) and girls (safety) for info about dams to be included in the advertisement.
 
Escorts simply cannot advertise that they provide illegal, unsafe and unprotected ******* sex service's. Its illegal. Not to mention huge health risks...

Oral sex can transmit several sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, HPV, and HIV. These STIs can be passed from the genitals to the mouth and throat, or vice versa.

Not only is it illegal but extremely unsafe for escorts. Clients need to understand they can spread disease to escorts via oral sex and that is not fair to expect that to be offered. The disease is inside your mouth and throat.

Its about health and safety.

If you are wanting unsafe and unprotected sex service's perhaps escorts in NZ are not the right avenue to engage in sex service's.
 
Top Dog 1968 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...

You could take this even further and say that DFK is prohibited under the PRA.

The law isn't necessarily a perfect reflection of societal norms. Generally, but with exception, norm changes outpace law changes.

While this does not necessarily justify breaking it, it does mean that it will be broken. I'm sure you agree that it's better for everyone if the service is transparently advertised/described?

Your response is also, to some extent, a strawman. The query is about dam requirement girls being advertised as such, not vice versa.
 
Last edited:
I went to see Victoria last year and she told me about the Dam before I paid. I actually decided to walk. It’s the only time I have ever done this at Dollhouse.

She was definitely hot, but I could tell that she was not in a great mood and I suspect I was not gonna get her best service. Might have just been a bad day, might have been I was totally unattractive to her, who knows. But I’m glad I walked. So many great options at $350 that it’s not worth the risk when you get a bad vibe straight away.

As for the Dam. I think putting it in their profile would be a good idea.
 
Yea. Agree. It's not a common thing in NZ so notice is good.
Meanwhile is Oz. Dam's are common as monks.
Anyhooo.

If the girls want a dam to feel safe, good on them. Not fair to judge them.
 
Viva le dam!!! Agree it should be in the print so that punters know. I had a punt with a Sapphire Blue girl who told me about the using Jean Claude Van Dam after I had paid for the session. I acted cool at the time, but my wallet was crying.
 
To all you punters who clearly DON'T understand the NZ Prostitution reform act AND who do not care about spreading diseases from your mouth / throat to escorts via oral sex.

Escorts adhere to the NZ Prostitution Reform act. This means they must, at all times, ensure safe sex practices.

If a client performs ORAL ON AN ESCORT WITHOUT ORAL DAM This is illegal PLUS exposes the escort to the diseases you are harboring in your throat / mouth from all the UNPROTECTED ORAL SEX you are performing! Plus unprotected, NO CONDOM BJS ETC!

The fact you are ranting about your "right" to perform oral unprotected, and as some punters quote, at a discount is revolting, selfish and absolutely absurd!

If you wish to selfishly spread diseases perhaps try NON ESCORT forums!

This is extremely disturbing to the point you are "Shaming" escorts who practice safe sex.

Escorts have the right to protect themselves from diseases. This is their life... They don't want HIV, SYPHILIS, HERPES, CHLAMYDIA, HEPATITIS, GONORRHEA ETC...

Perhaps take your requests to the dark web 🤮 🤮 🤮

"Criminal conviction, fines and risk of disease for no condom / latex services!
 
Top Dog 1968 said:
Please, Log in or Register to view quote content!
Click to expand...
Bla bla bla bla

It's actually MORE DANGEROUS for the giver of M2F oral with HPV CANCERS , throat gonorrhea etc anyways...

No one is shaming anyone you half wit - repeatedly everyone is saying that you should disclose this in your bio and it's up the the punter if he wishes to support your position. You seem to want to have your cake and eat it too.

Anyways, I tire of your HOOKER OVERLORD LECTURING (to guys who have been in this game since you were in kindergarten) - perhaps AF is the place for you, they love that shit over there.. So off you pop sweetheart (I'll spell that out for you that's UK STREET SLANG for FUCK OFF)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top